Look, I’m all for this kind of stuff when it has basis in fact but this does not. Sexualistation of the female breast is not a social construct.
The stimulation of nipple in females releases oxytocin which strengthens desire for their sexual partner. In essence men can make themselves more desirable/attractive through stimulation of the female nipple (the same does not hold true for males) which makes gives it a lot of signifigance. In addition swollen breasts indicate fertility (an evolutionary signal for desire to mate).
DISCLAIMER: IN NO WAY AM I IMPLYING THAT THIS IS AN EXCUSE FOR MALES. ANY UNSOLICITED OR HARASSING BEHAVIOR IS INEXCUSABLE.
What I am stating is that the female nipple is fundamentally different from the male nipple. Is part of this cultural? Absolutely, there are African tribes where women have walked topless for ages and men just don’t see breasts the same way.Is all of this cultural? No. The claim this post is making is false. The sexualistation of female breasts is largely evolutionary. I would be all for treating the male and female breasts the same way but this claim is more combative than constructive.
Ok so earthbenders can metal bend, waterbenders can blood bend, and firebenders can lighting bend. What special thing can an airbender do?
I always thought it was the ability to bend air out of people’s lung but it was just never touched on because the air monks are peaceful